P
|
M
|
I
|
· Self-esteem
building – the positive flow on from removing the time constraints and
pressures have seen children take greater ownership, come in early in class
to continue, lengthier pieces. More
passionate and enthused to write.
· Wanting
to share their sentences/ideas/writing
· Bouncing
ideas off each other
· Positive
responses to others and valuing what each other says
· Building
on from each other’s expertise
· “Borrowing”
other people’s language to build their own
· Having
confidence to improve/edit
· Publishing
pieces shows the quality of the message in deeper features – shows that the
guts of their writing is good when not looking at the surface features
· Authentic
purpose with blog/weebly and home sharing
· Greater
awareness of own abilities and skills
· Being
able to articulate their own learning
· Reflecting
on own learning by finding what they’ve been able to do well; what they need
to improve on; what they need to continue
· Experiences
and having the time factored in for hands-on experiences
· Having
fun with literacy is valued
|
· Enormous
amount of time for small number of children; takes away from that ‘next
group’ up.
· Each
of us having to individually come up with own resources – be nice to having a
folder or resource to call on and save time.
· Not
enough time for us to get together and share what has been working in our own
rooms.
· Very
little guidance and PD so we’ve had to fly on our own and this was frustrating,
enthusiasm drops off.
· Workload
could have easily gotten out of hand with proposed fortnightly
readings/meetings.
|
· Has
showed the kind of impact you can have on the learners: quality vs quantity
· Having
fun with literacy is valued
· Resource/folder/gear
to provide greater guidance at the beginning
· We
wonder how much further we would have got had we had the opportunity for
better coaching.
|
What would our literacy programme look like based on our inquiry learning?
-list of genre set for the year and teachers in classes have flexibility to address this as the year progresses and as opportunities arise. Teachers/class making these decisions and can ensure greater integration and support with reading and topic.
-moderation doesn’t need to be specific to genre because the rubric is generic (with exception of one line about structure) so can moderate by looking at the skills/quality of writing no matter what the purpose/topic.
-variety of teaching - including groups but based on needs, not on overall level.
-spelling programme needs to happen across the school as it is in the standard, greater emphasis on the skills to come through from the middle school to take the thinking away from encoding to the thinking of writing.
-independent book needs to take a greater focus for writers (and for moderation) rather than “teaching to the test”
-mixture of whole class, collaborative, group and peer interactions for learning.
-time must be allowed for oral discussions and idea sharing conversations to support their writing, the importance of this cannot be underestimated.
-lower achievers need more time for deconstructing, talking and understanding and that is okay.